What Anthropic learned mapping a year’s worth of AI-enabled cyber threats

We examine 832 accounts that were banned for malicious cyber activity between March 2025 and March 2026 and map them onto MITRE ATT&CK, a longstanding database of the tactics and techniques used by cyberattackers.

Three main conclusions:

  • Malicious actors are using AI in ways that make them more dangerous.
  • Cyberattacks are becoming more autonomous.
  • The MITRE ATT&CK framework does not fully capture the tools and activities that make AI-enabled attackers so dangerous.
  • How AI makes attackers more dangerous

  • 67% used AI to prepare a cyberattack (eg writing malware)
  • 6.5% used AI to assist with lateral movement, n(avigating deep inside a compromised network)
  • In the first six-months, 33% of actors were classified as medium risk or higher.
  • By the second six-months, that share had jumped to 56%
  • Use of AI shifted from techniques to gain initial access towards activity carried out once they were inside the system.
  • Use of AI for account discovery rose 8.9%, while AI-assisted phishing fell 8.6%.
  • AI can now be made to perform these activities on behalf of less sophisticated actors.
  • Why it’s harder to assess an actor’s threat level

    Why security frameworks need to change

    Looking ahead